Browse the case tracker

  • Search

  • Year

  • Court

  • Area of Law

  • ADR Type

  • ADR Outcome

MJS Projects (March) Limited v RPS Consulting Services Limited [2026] EWHC 884 (TCC)

Year: Court: Area of Law: ADR Type: ADR Outcome:

Practical Point

Refusing to mediate before seeing the expert evidence was not unreasonable where the claimant had never engaged with the workmanship case.

Consequence: None — usual order made, claimant to pay defendant's costs; 10% reduction on account

Judgment of Her Honour Judge Kelly (sitting as a Judge of the High Court).

Mediation sought by Claimant; refused by Defendant.

Authorities applied: Halsey.

Decided under the post-October 2024 CPR 44.2(5)(e). Court stressed that mediation is not the only or preferred form of ADR and that the defendant had engaged in other ADR and made offers.

Paragraphs: 3-8, 26-48, 85-87  ·  Read the judgment →